How AI Is Reshaping Our Understanding of Prosperity

While revealing uncomfortable truths about economic growth

Brian Demsey | Published in The Information | 2025

← Back to Articles

Traditional economic metrics increasingly fail to capture what matters most to actual human welfare

The Problem We Refuse to Measure

We are flying blind. Governments worldwide make trillion-dollar policy decisions based on metrics that fundamentally misrepresent human welfare. GDP rises while loneliness becomes epidemic. Employment reaches record highs while workers cannot afford housing. Stock markets soar while trust in institutions collapses. We have built an entire apparatus of economic measurement that tells us everything about production and almost nothing about whether people can actually live decent lives.

This is not an academic complaint. Real people are suffering in ways our official statistics cannot see. Forty-four percent of Americans report lacking strong relationships with friends and family—a crisis of social capital that no interest rate adjustment can fix. Nearly two-thirds of Egypt's 100 million citizens live in or near poverty while their government reports GDP growth. Australia, one of the world's wealthiest nations, has become the only OECD country where real household incomes have declined since the pandemic, yet its prosperity numbers look fine on paper.

The stakes could not be higher. Without accurate measurements of human wellbeing, we cannot design effective policies, allocate resources wisely, or even have honest conversations about whether our economic systems are working. We are optimizing for the wrong variables while the things that matter most—community, security, health, trust, dignity—deteriorate in plain sight.

What Needs to Happen

Policymakers must immediately expand national statistics beyond GDP to include comprehensive wellbeing metrics—social capital, housing security, institutional trust, and mental health indicators. Central banks should incorporate wellbeing data into monetary policy decisions alongside inflation and employment. Corporations need to adopt real-time AI-driven sentiment analysis not as a productivity tool but as an early warning system for employee welfare crises.

Most critically, we need regulatory frameworks that require the same transparency for wellbeing data that we currently demand for financial reporting. This is not aspirational. The technology exists. The surveys exist. What's missing is the political will to measure what matters and the courage to act on what we find.

Here is what I learned after examining wellbeing data across five continents, and why artificial intelligence may be our best hope for finally measuring what actually matters. But first, the evidence demands we confront an uncomfortable truth: the tools we have used for decades to assess human progress are not just inadequate—they are actively misleading.


The Deceptive Simplicity of "Are We Better Off?"

The question "Are we better off?" seems deceptively simple. Yet as I discovered through a deep dive into global wellbeing data spanning continents and cultures, the answer reveals a fundamental crisis in how we measure human prosperity.

What emerged was something far more interesting than a simple yes or no: a portrait of a world where traditional economic indicators increasingly diverge from actual lived experience, and where artificial intelligence is beginning to fill the measurement gap that governments have long ignored.


The American Contradiction

Start with the United States, where the Federal Reserve's 2024 Economic Well-Being survey paints a picture of cautious stability masking deeper anxiety. Seventy-three percent of Americans reported doing "okay or living comfortably financially"—a statistic that sounds reassuring until you dig deeper. Twenty-nine percent said they were worse off than a year earlier. Sixty-three percent could cover a $400 emergency expense with cash, unchanged from recent years but down from 68% in 2021. These are the numbers of a middle class treading water.

But here's where it gets interesting: Americans' fear of crime is at a thirty-year high, even as actual crime statistics tell a different story. In 2025, perceptions improved slightly—49% viewing crime as extremely or very serious, down seven points from 2024—but the fear of walking alone at night remains elevated in ways that GDP growth cannot capture or remedy.

The Loneliness Crisis

The loneliness data is perhaps most striking. Forty-four percent of Americans report they do not have strong or close relationships with friends and family. Among young adults aged 18–34, this climbs to 51%. This is not a recession you can fight with interest rate cuts. This is a structural hollowing out of social capital that economists have barely begun to measure, let alone address.

The Trust Collapse

Media trust has collapsed to levels that would alarm anyone concerned about democratic governance. Only 31% of Americans have a "great deal" or "fair amount" of confidence in the mass media to report news fully, accurately, and fairly—near the all-time low of 32% from 2016. Democrats show 54% trust, Republicans just 12%. We are not simply divided on policy; we inhabit different factual universes.


The Wartime Economy Illusion: Russia

Russia presents the most paradoxical case study. By conventional metrics, Russia's economy appears robust: 3.6% GDP growth in 2024, unemployment at a historic low of 2.4%, real wages up 8% year-over-year through late 2024. Defense spending has created what looks like an economic boom, with workers commanding premium wages in tight labor markets.

Yet peel back one layer and the picture darkens considerably. Russia's economy has become a zero-sum game between civilian welfare and military production. Consumer goods inflation reached 10–12% in some categories. The central bank was forced to raise interest rates to 21%—the highest since 2003—to combat overheating. Labor shortages are acute not because the economy is thriving, but because hundreds of thousands of workers have been mobilized for war.

Life satisfaction tells the real story. According to the European Quality of Life Survey, only 30% of Russians report high life satisfaction, compared to 72% in high-income Western European countries. Civil and political freedoms have been systematically dismantled. Human Rights Watch reports that thousands remain in lengthy pretrial detention for peaceful dissent, while censorship laws make even calling the war a "war" punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

This is growth at gunpoint—an economy measuring activity rather than welfare, mistaking destruction for production. Russia's GDP may grow, but its people are demonstrably worse off by almost any measure that matters to actual human wellbeing.


The Israeli Exception

Israel offers perhaps the most sociologically fascinating case. Despite ongoing conflict that would devastate most societies, Israel maintains some of the highest life satisfaction scores globally. The 2025 Gallup data shows life satisfaction at 7.12 on a 10-point scale—higher than countries like the United Kingdom and Germany.

The secret? Social capital. An extraordinary 90% of Israelis report having someone to rely on in times of trouble. This is not merely a statistic; it represents a genuine social infrastructure that functions as a buffer against external threat. As happiness researchers note, external challenges can paradoxically bond communities together when those communities have sufficient existing social cohesion.

Yet even here, the picture fractures along predictable fault lines. Jewish Israelis are three times as likely as Arab Israelis to express optimism about national security—63% versus 21%. Trust in government remains abysmal at 26%, though trust in the IDF stands at 75%. Israel demonstrates that you can have high life satisfaction amid conflict if you have strong social networks, but you cannot paper over fundamental political divisions with positive sentiment alone.


Egypt's Brutal Arithmetic

Egypt strips away any pretense that economic growth automatically translates to human welfare. Nearly two-thirds of Egypt's 100 million citizens live in or near poverty. Consumer inflation reached 33.3% in 2024, though it has since declined to 11.70% in September 2025. Real wages collapsed—down 4.7% in 2022 and 32% in 2023 when accounting for inflation.

The housing statistics are particularly grim. In Cairo, roughly 11 million of 17 million inhabitants live in extra-legally formed housing lacking basic services like electricity, water, and sewage. Ten million children are multi-dimensionally poor, lacking clean water, healthcare, and education. Debt servicing is projected to consume 65% of government expenditures in fiscal year 2025/26.

Yet Egypt has achieved genuine public health victories. Life expectancy has climbed from 45 years in the 1960s to 75 years in 2024. The country reduced its Hepatitis C rate from 22% to 0.4% through an aggressive screening and treatment program. These are not trivial achievements. They demonstrate that even deeply challenged states can deliver specific, measurable improvements in human welfare when they prioritize the right interventions.

The larger pattern, however, is one of authoritarian governance systematically trading political freedom for partial economic development—and delivering neither effectively. Egypt's GDP growth tells you almost nothing about whether its citizens can afford to eat, send their children to school, or speak freely about their government's failures.


Australia's Prosperity Crisis

Australia should be a success story. Life expectancy sits at 83.3 years, among the world's highest. Education attainment is excellent, with 81% of adults aged 25–64 holding a high school qualification, well above the OECD average of 75%. The country maintains robust democratic institutions and scores 6.7 on a 10-point life satisfaction scale.

But beneath the surface, Australia faces a profound cost-of-living crisis that challenges the notion of first-world prosperity. The country is the only OECD nation where real household incomes have declined since the pandemic. Housing affordability has reached crisis proportions, with 1.26 million low-income households in financial housing stress and approximately 42% of lower-income renter households living in housing stress.

Perhaps most troubling: around 3.3 million Australians—13% of the population—live below the poverty line, worse than the OECD average of 12.1%. Almost 20% cannot raise emergency funds. This is not a developing nation struggling to provide basic services. This is a wealthy country that has allowed housing speculation and wage suppression to undermine the living standards of a significant portion of its population.

Australia demonstrates that being rich is no guarantee against inequality, that having excellent institutions does not automatically translate to accessible housing, and that maintaining high average prosperity can coexist with a large underclass struggling with basic economic security. The country's challenges stem not from lack of resources but from policy choices that have systematically favored asset holders over wage earners, investors over workers, and existing homeowners over their children.


The AI Measurement Revolution

Into this measurement crisis steps artificial intelligence, and here the story takes an unexpected turn. While governments struggle with decade-old survey methodologies, employers like Cisco and Adidas are deploying AI tools that gauge employee sentiment from chats, emails, and surveys in real-time—essentially taking a "vibe check" on organizational morale and stress levels.

This is not merely about efficiency. This represents a fundamental shift in how we understand and respond to human welfare. Traditional wellbeing surveys are retrospective, infrequent, and aggregated at scales that obscure individual experience. AI-driven sentiment analysis operates continuously, at granular levels, and with the ability to identify emerging patterns before they become crises.

Companionship and Care

The implications extend far beyond workplace productivity. Companion robots like ElliQ now provide conversation, caregiving assistance, and friendship to elderly populations. These devices respond to voice commands, engage in small talk, remind users to take medications, suggest exercises, and initiate calls with loved ones. Early studies indicate measurably reduced loneliness and improved health outcomes.

Scaling Access

In mental healthcare, AI applications are expanding access in ways traditional clinical models cannot match. Cultural aspects of mental health that once created barriers are being addressed through multilingual AI services. Countries are making massive investments: Canada pledged $2.4 billion, France committed €109 billion, Saudi Arabia's Project Transcendence represents a $100 billion initiative. Two-thirds of countries now offer or plan to offer K–12 computer science education—double the number from 2019. Africa and Latin America are making the most dramatic progress.

This is infrastructure investment of a sort that will reshape educational and economic opportunity for an entire generation.


What This Means

The pattern across these case studies is consistent: traditional economic metrics increasingly fail to capture what matters most to actual human welfare. GDP growth tells you nothing about loneliness, housing affordability, or the ability to trust your neighbor. Employment rates say nothing about whether those jobs pay enough to afford rent. Literacy statistics are meaningless if young people cannot find work that uses their education.

What emerges instead is a picture of wellbeing built on several interdependent pillars: economic security (not just income, but the ability to weather emergencies), social capital (relationships and community trust), physical and mental health, housing stability, political freedom, and—critically—institutional trust.


The Lessons


The Open Question

The AI measurement revolution may finally give us the tools to see what has always been true: that human flourishing requires more than economic growth, that community matters more than consumption, and that the things we can most easily measure—GDP, employment rates, stock prices—are often the things that matter least to actual lived experience.

The uncomfortable question is whether our political and economic systems are capable of optimizing for wellbeing once we can actually measure it by contemporary standards. Based on the evidence from across the globe, that question remains very much open.

Brian Demsey is the founder and CEO of Hallucinations.cloud LLC, an AI safety infrastructure company. He has over 50 years of business experience building technology companies and has written previously for The Information on AI investment trends and productivity costs.